Effect of Hydroxychloroquine, Favipiravir, Lopinavir/Ritonavir, Remdesivir, Umifenovir, and Interferon beta-1a in Covid-19 patients: A systematic review of Randomized Clinical Trials

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a global pandemic on March 11, 2020. Since then, researchers worldwide have focused their attention on identifying effective treatments and developing vaccines to combat this disease. Aim: To report the effectiveness of the drugs employed in the COVID-19 treatment protocols based on data from clinical trial studies conducted from the beginning of the pandemic until December 10, 2020. Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted an advanced search in several electronic databases. A total of 13553 studies was screened by two people simultaneously and separately based on the article title, and full-text. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane criteria. Results: Of the 13553 studies identified, 50 clinical trials were included in this systematic review. Of these, three studies explored the use of remdesivir, nine studies the use of hydroxychloroquine, five studies the use of lopinavir/ritonavir, six studies the use of favipiravir, one study the use of tocilizumab, two studies the use of interferon beta-1a and two studies the use of umifenovir.

PEDV orf3 independently regulates IB kinase beta-mediated NF-B and IFN-beta promoter activities

The Open Reading Frame 3 (ORF3), an accessory protein of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), has been shown to interact with a myriad of cellular proteins, among which include the IB kinase beta (IKBKB). Here, specific IKBKB domains responsible for ORF3-IKBKB interaction were identified. Dysregulation of NF-B and Type I interferon (IFN) in the presence of ORF3 was also demonstrated. We showed that while ORF3 was capable of up-regulating IKBKB-meditated NF-B promoter activity, it surprisingly down-regulated the activation of IKBKB-meditated IFN-beta promoter and expression of IFN-beta mRNA. When overexpressed, ORF3 could suppress Poly I:C mediated type I IFN production and induction. Finally, we demonstrated that IKBKB- and RIG-I-mediated type I IFN induction by ORF3 resulted in different outcomes. Our study is the first to demonstrate the potential and complex roles of ORF3 in the involvement of aberrant immune signaling as well as in the virus-host interaction.

What is common to MDA5 and COVID-19?

Respiratory complaints and nonspecific systemic symptoms combined with bilateral ground glass opacities on chest imaging constitute the clinical and radiological picture of both COVID-19 disease and anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis. Those findings together with the identification of anti-MDA5 antibodies in sera of certain COVID-19-positive patients allude for a common immunogenic basis. The common pathophysiological denominator is the cytokine storm. Modulation of interferon beta pathway plays role in both diseases;this observation can direct us for potential immunomodulatory therapies for both COVID-19 and anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis. This chapter will discuss in detail the clinical, radiological, and laboratory similarities of both COVID-19 disease and anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis. © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

STING gene knockout pig alveolar macrophage cell model constructed by CRISPR/Cas9 technology and its effect on type I interferon transcription. (Special Issue: Swine industry science.)

Objective: To elucidate the mechanism of interferon gene stimulating factor (STING) in the anti-pathogenic microbial infection of pigs, so as to further provide a reference for the scientific prevention and control of viral diseases such as porcine transmissible gastroenteritis, epidemic diarrhea and porcine pseudorabies. Method: High-scored targets were found in exons 4 and 8 of STING gene and corresponding sgRNA sequences were designed based on CRISPR/ Cas9 technology. The annealed sgRNAs were linked with the enzyme digested LentiCRISPRV2 carrier with T4 DNA ligase to obtain LentiCRISPRV2-STING-sgRNA lentivirus carrier(STING-sgRNA);Different combinations of STING sgRNA lentivirus carriers, packaging plasmid psPAX2 and envelope plasmid pMD2.G were transfected into 293T cells to obtain lentivirus containing sgRNA and then transduced into 3D4/21 cells. Monoclonal cell lines were obtained by puromycin screening and limited dilution method. The knockout efficiencies of the STING gene were identified by PCR amplification, Sequencing and Western blotting;The effect of STING gene knockout on the expression of type I interferon was verified by real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR. Result: When 293T cells were transfected with different combinations of STING-sgRNA lentivirus carrier and HA-STING over expression vector, the editing effect of STING eukaryotic expression carrier could be detected in cells, and the combination of STING-sgRNA(1+5)lentivirus carrier showed the supreme editing efficiency. Thus, the STING-sgRNA(1+5)lentivirus carrier combined with the packaging plasmid psPAX2 and the envelope plasmid pMD2.G were transfected 293T cells to package lentivirus, and then infected 3D4/21 cells with lentivirus. The results showed that a 3D4/21 cell line with a large deletion of the STING gene(4989 bp)was obtained. The STING protein was not observed by Western blotting, indicating that the STING gene knockout 3D4/21 cells(3D4/ 21-STING-/-)were successfully constructed. The transcription level of IFN-beta in 3D4/21-STING-/- cells decreased significantly (P<0.05) compared with parental cells when stimulated by transfection of Haemophilusparasuis DNA. Conclusion : By applying CRISPR/Cas9 technology, STING gene is successfully knock out in 3D4/21 cells, resulting in loss of function of STING gene;STING knockout leads to the transcription disorder of type I interferon when cells are stimulated by DNA, which also suggests that STING gene may be a key factor in the anti-pathogenic microbial infection of pigs.

COVID-19 Vaccine Response in People with Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Dimethyl Fumarate, Diroximel Fumarate, Natalizumab, Ocrelizumab, or Interferon Beta Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Some multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) impair responses to vaccines, emphasizing the importance of understanding COVID-19 vaccine immune responses in people with MS (PwMS) receiving different DMTs. METHODS: This prospective, open-label observational study enrolled 45 participants treated with natalizumab (n = 12), ocrelizumab (n = 16), fumarates (dimethyl fumarate or diroximel fumarate, n = 11), or interferon beta (n = 6); ages 18-65 years inclusive; stable on DMT for at least 6 months. Responder rates, anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain IgG (anti-RBD) geometric mean titers (GMTs), antigen-specific T cells, and vaccination-related adverse events were evaluated at baseline and 8, 24, 36, and 48 weeks after first mRNA-1273 (Moderna) dose. RESULTS: At 8 weeks post vaccination, all natalizumab-, fumarate-, and interferon beta-treated participants generated detectable anti-RBD IgG titers, compared to only 25% of the ocrelizumab cohort. At 24 and 36 weeks post vaccination, natalizumab-, fumarate-, and interferon beta-treated participants continued to demonstrate detectable anti-RBD IgG titers, whereas participants receiving ocrelizumab did not. Anti-RBD GMTs decreased 81.5% between 8 and 24 weeks post vaccination for the non-ocrelizumab-treated participants, with no significant difference between groups. At 36 weeks post vaccination, ocrelizumab-treated participants had higher proportions of spike-specific T cells compared to other treatment groups. Vaccine-associated side effects were highest in the ocrelizumab arm for most symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that humoral response to mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine is preserved and similar in PwMS treated with natalizumab, fumarate, and interferon beta, but muted with ocrelizumab. All DMTs had preserved T cell response, including the ocrelizumab cohort, which also had a greater risk of vaccine-related side effects.

Early treatment of high-risk hospitalized COVID-19 patients with a combination of interferon beta-1b and remdesivir: a phase 2 open-label randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Early antiviral therapy was effective in the treatment of COVID-19. We assessed the efficacy and safety of combined interferon beta-1b and remdesivir treatment in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, prospective open-label, randomized-controlled trial involving high-risk adults hospitalized for COVID-19. Patients were randomly assigned to a 5-day interferon beta-1b 16 million units daily and remdesivir 200mg loading on day 1 followed by 100mg daily on day 2 to 5 (combination-group), or to remdesivir only of similar regimen (control-group) (1:1). The primary end-point was the time to complete alleviation of symptoms (NEWS2 = 0). RESULTS: Two-hundred and twelve patients were enrolled. The median days of starting treatment from symptom-onset was 3 days. The median age was 65 years and 159 patients (75%) had chronic disease. The baseline demographics were similar. There was no mortality. For the primary-endpoint, the combination-group was significantly quicker to NEWS2 = 0 (4 versus 6.5 days; hazard-ratio [HR],6.59; 95% confidence-interval [CI],6.1-7.09; p < 0.0001) when compared to the control-group. For the secondary endpoints, the combination-group was quicker to negative NPS VL (6 versus 8 days; HR,8.16; 95% CI,7.79-8.52; p < 0.0001) and develop seropositive IgG (8 versus 10 days; HR,10.78; 95% CI,9.98-11.58; p < 0.0001). All adverse events resolved upon follow-up. Combination group (HR,4.1 95%CI,1.9-8.6, p < 0.0001), was the most significant independent factor associated with NEWS2 = 0 on day 4. CONCLUSIONS: Early treatment with interferon beta-1b and remdesivir was safe and better than remdesivir only in alleviating symptoms, shorten viral shedding and hospitalization with earlier seropositivity in high-risk COVID-19 patients.

An Overview of the Approaches for the Pharmacotherapy of Pandemic Causing Coronaviruses of the 21st Century

The 21st century has witnessed 3 major pandemics caused by coronaviruses namely, severe acute respiratory syndrome, Middle East respiratory syndrome and coronavirus disease-19. Though previously considered non-pathogenic in humans, these viruses have found a way to infect the human population. The viruses have traversed various intermediate host pools from their natural reservoirs before spilling out in humans. From severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2003 to Middle East respiratory syndrome in 2012 to coronavirus disease-19 in 2019, clinical research, safety and efficacy studies performed during each outbreak have led to new developments in the pharmacotherapeutics of human coronavirus infections. Severe acute respiratory syndrome was initially identified as a disease-causing pneumonia and hence was treated by antibiotics followed by corticosteroids for acute respiratory distress syndrome. After detecting the viral origin of the disease, the use of antivirals like ribavirin, ritonavir/lopinavir, Type I Interferons and their combinations started to gain momentum. Middle East respiratory syndrome led to repositioning of therapies employed in severe acute respiratory syndrome along with introduction of new agents like mycophenolic acid, cyclosporine and remdesivir. The emergence of novel coronavirus causing coronavirus disease-19 has led to repurposing of molecules like chloroquine, remdesivir and favipiravir for containing the virus. In addition, the effectiveness of plasma therapy and antibody treatment has been investigated through small scale observational studies.

Safety and Efficacy of Interferon beta-1b in the Treatment of Severe COVID-19 Patients: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: About a year after the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the results of the studies conducted to investigate the effectiveness of interferon (INF) compounds in this disease were contradictory.Objectives: This study was carried out to examine the safety and efficacy of a treatment protocol containing INF-beta-1b, hydroxy-chloroquine, and Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir) in patients with severe COVID-19.Methods: In this open-label, randomized controlled trial, severe cases of COVID-19 were included. Patients were eligible if they had epidemiological and radiological evidence compatible with COVID-19 or a positive polymerase chain reaction result and their disease was severe. They were randomly allocated into a control group that received the standard regimen (hydroxychloroquine and Kaletra) and an intervention group that received INF-beta-1b treatment and the standard treatment regimen. Then, the two groups were compared in terms of in-hospital mortality, intubation, length of hospital stay, oxygen saturation, and lactate dehydrogenase before and after the intervention.Results: A total of 91 cases of severe COVID-19 were enrolled for analysis [intervention (n = 47) and control (n = 44)]. The length of hospital stay in the intervention group was significantly longer than in the control group (13.21 +/- 6.88 vs. 10.52 +/- 5.77 days;P = 0.047). The mortality rate did not significantly differ between the intervention and control groups (19.15% and 13.64%, respectively;P = 0.509). The intubation rate did not significantly differ between the intervention and control groups (12.76% and 11.36%, respectively;P = 0.838).Conclusions: The use of INF-beta-1b-containing treatment regimens does not reduce mortality and intubation rates among patients with severe COVID-19. Furthermore, it might even increase the severity of the disease and the length of hospital stay for some pa-tients;therefore, it is not recommended to use INF-beta-1b in severe cases of COVID-19.

Suicide attempt and severe depression in a patient with COVID-19, the possible effect of therapeutic regimes

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has different manifestations including neurologic manifestations. Lack of a suit-able therapeutic regime and administration of a variety of treatments could worsen disease manifestations. Some medical interventions besides the high level of stress and quarantined conditions could induce severe depression and even suicide attempts. Here we presented a 42-year-old man without a history of psychiatric disorders that had been admitted to the clinic due to worsening of his dyspnea. After history taking and physical examination, he had been hospitalized and interferon, corticosteroids, and other conservative treatments had been started. According to his clinical manifestations, the doses and medications had been changed the next days. On the morning of his seventh day of hospitalization he had several suicidal attempts which were not successful and after changes in his medications, starting antidepressant drugs, and visiting his family members he had been discharged without the idea of suicide and depressed mood. This report showed the important role of medical staff in monitoring the mental health of COVID-19 patients as there are many risk factors for them to develop psychiatric disturbance. They should be aware of the possible effect of drugs in the alternat-ing mood of patients and even causing suicidal thoughts. We also suggest increasing the level of tryptophan sources in meals of patients and administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in patients with signs of depression after further studies.

Lost in Translation: Evaluation of Subcutaneous Interferon-ß Treatment for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Real Life.

Despite in vitro activity of interferon-ß (IFN-ß) against SARS-CoV-2 infection, its clinical efficacy remains controversial. We evaluated the impact of IFN-ß treatment in a cohort of 3590 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during March−April 2020. The primary endpoint was a composed variable of admission to intensive care unit (ICU)/death. Overall, 153 patients (4%) received IFN-ß. They were significantly more severely ill, with a worse clinical and analytical situation, explaining a higher ICU admission (30% vs. 17%; p < 0.01), and a shorter time to the composed variable. In a Cox regression analysis, older age, lymphopenia, renal failure, or increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were associated with a greater hazard ratio (HR) of admission at ICU/death. Notably, the HR of IFN-ß for the outcome variable was no longer significant after adjustment (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.82−1.30), and different sensitivity analysis (early IFN use, ICU admission) showed no changes in the estimates. A propensity score matching analysis showed no association of IFN-ß therapy and outcome. In conclusion, in this large cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, IFN-ß was used mainly in patients with advanced disease, reflecting an important bias of selection. After adjusting by severity, IFN-ß was not associated with a higher rate of ICU admission or mortality.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Protects Bystander Cells against Influenza A Virus Infection by Triggering Secretion of Type I and Type III Interferons.

We observed the interference between two prevalent respiratory viruses, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza A virus (IAV) (H1N1), and characterized its molecular underpinnings in alveolar epithelial cells (A549). We found that RSV induces higher levels of interferon beta (IFN-ß) production than IAV and that IFN-ß priming confers higher-level protection against infection with IAV than with RSV. Consequently, we focused on the sequential infection scheme of RSV and then IAV. Using A549 wild-type (WT), IFNAR1 knockout (KO), IFNLR1 KO, and IFNAR1-IFNLR1 double-KO cell lines, we found that both IFN-ß and IFN-λ are necessary for maximum protection against subsequent infection. Immunostaining revealed that preinfection with RSV partitions the cell population into a subpopulation susceptible to subsequent infection with IAV and an IAV-proof subpopulation. Strikingly, the susceptible cells turned out to be those already compromised and efficiently expressing RSV, whereas the bystander, interferon-primed cells are resistant to IAV infection. Thus, virus-virus exclusion at the cell population level is not realized through direct competition for a shared ecological niche (single cell) but rather is achieved with the involvement of specific cytokines induced by the host's innate immune response. IMPORTANCE Influenza A virus (IAV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are common recurrent respiratory infectants that show a relatively high coincidence. We demonstrated that preinfection with RSV partitions the cell population into a subpopulation susceptible to subsequent infection with IAV and an IAV-proof subpopulation. The susceptible cells are those already compromised and efficiently expressing RSV, whereas the bystander cells are resistant to IAV infection. The cross-protective effect critically depends on IFN-ß and IFN-λ signaling and thus ensues when the proportion of cells preinfected with RSV is relatively low yet sufficient to trigger a pervasive antiviral state in bystander cells. Our study suggests that mild, but not severe, respiratory infections may have a short-lasting protective role against more dangerous respiratory viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Controversies in neuroimmunology: multiple sclerosis, vaccination, SARSCoV-2 and other dilemas

Neuroimmunology is a discipline that increasingly broadens its horizons in the understanding of neurological diseases. At the same time and in front of the pathophysiological links of neurological diseases and immunology, specific diagnostic and therapeutic approaches have been proposed. Despite the important advances in this discipline, there are multiple dilemmas that concern and filter into clinical practice. This article presents 15 controversies and a discussion about them, which are built with the most up-to-date evidence available. The topics included in this review are: steroid decline in relapses of multiple sclerosis (MS), therapeutic recommendations in MS in light of the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, evidence of vaccination in MS and other demyelinating diseases, overview current situation of isolated clinical and radiological syndrome, therapeutic failure in MS as well as criteria for suspension of disease-modifying therapies, evidence of the management of mild relapses in MS, recommendations for prophylaxis against strongyloides stercolaris, usefulness of a second course of immunoglobulin in the syndrome Guillain-Barre (GBS), criteria to differentiate an acute-onset inflammatory demyelinating chronic polyneuropathy versus GBS and the utility of angiotensin-converting enzyme in neurosarcoidosis. In each of the controversies, the general problem is presented and specific recommendations are offered that can be adopted in daily clinical practice.

The effect of Vitamin C and Zn supplementation on the immune system and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients.

SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2) is the most dangerous form of the coronavirus, which causes COVID-19. In patients with severe COVID-19, the immune system becomes markedly overactive. There is evidence that supplementation with select micronutrients may play a role in maintaining immune system function in this patient population. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, significant emphasis has been placed on the importance of supplementing critical micronutrients such as Vitamin C and Zinc (Zn) due to their immunomodulatory effects. Viral infections, like COVID-19, increase physiological demand for these micronutrients. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to provide comprehensive information regarding the potential effectiveness of Vitamin C and Zn supplementation during viral infection and specifically COVID-19. This review demonstrated a relation between Vitamin C and Zn deficiency and a reduction in the innate immune response, which can ultimately make patients with COVID-19 more vulnerable to viral infection. As such, adequate intake of Vitamin C and Zn, as an adjunctive therapeutic approach with any necessary pharmacological treatment(s), may be necessary to mitigate the adverse physiological effects of COVID-19. To truly clarify the role of Vitamin C and Zn supplementation in the management of COVID-19, we must wait for the results of ongoing randomized controlled trials. The toxicity of Vitamin C and Zn should also be considered to prevent over-supplementation. Over-supplementation of Vitamin C can lead to oxalate toxicity, while increased Zn intake can reduce immune system function. In summary, Vitamin C and Zn supplementation may be useful in mitigating COVID-19 symptomology.

Essentials of COVID-19 and treatment approaches

The coronavirus family is as old as the 1930s when it first showed symptoms in chicken. The virus thereafter kept evolving and it has significantly taken over a large percentage of people worldwide in the form of this new pandemic. As of the present day, there is no treatment available for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2]), although supportive therapy and preventive measures have shown a tremendous control rate among certain patients. Drugs like remdesivir, camostat, nafamostat, ritonavir/lopinavir, several monoclonal antibodies, and CPs are in their early phases of trials. There are approved by the WHO under an emergency use authorization program. Favipiravir has entered its phase 3 clinical trial and is supported by evidence to show no or less adverse effects in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Vaccine development is accelerating its pace, and vaccines will probably become available by the end of the year 2020. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.

Comparative Toxicity of Interferon Beta-1a Impurities of Heavy Metal Ions.

Background and Objectives: Providing a proper quality control of drugs is essential for efficient treatment of various diseases minimizing the possible side effects of pharmaceutical active substances and potential impurities. Recent in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that certain heavy metalloids and metals interfere with protein folding of nascent proteins in cells and their biological function can be altered. It is unknown whether the drug impurities including heavy metals may affect the tertiary protein structure. Materials and Methods: ReciGen and Rebif are pharmaceutical interferon beta-1a (IFNß-1a) contained in preparations that are used for parenteral administration. Heavy metal impurities of these samples have been studied by gel electrophoresis, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis (ICP MS). The concentration of heavy metals including mercury, arsenic, nickel, chromium, iron, and aluminum did not exceed permitted levels established by International Council for Harmonisation guideline for elemental impurities. Results: The ICP MS analysis revealed the presence of heavy metals, moreover zeta potential was significantly different for IFNß-1a, which can be an indirect indication of the difference in composition of ReciGen and Rebif samples, respectively. FTIR analysis revealed very similar amide I and II bonds at 1654 and 1560 cm-1 attributed to the peptide absorption peaks of IFNß-1a in Rebif and ReciGen. Conclusions: It was hypothesized that the IFNß-1a complex binds heavy metals affecting the tertiary protein structure and may lead to some side effects of drug administration. Further testing of IFNß-1a bioequivalence for parenteral application is necessary.

All hands on deck: SARS-CoV-2 proteins that block early anti-viral interferon responses.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is responsible for the current pandemic coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19). Like other pathogens, SARS-CoV-2 infection can elicit production of the type I and III interferon (IFN) cytokines by the innate immune response. A rapid and robust type I and III IFN response can curb viral replication and improve clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection. To effectively replicate in the host, SARS-CoV-2 has evolved mechanisms for evasion of this innate immune response, which could also modulate COVID-19 pathogenesis. In this review, we discuss studies that have reported the identification and characterization of SARS-CoV-2 proteins that inhibit type I IFNs. We focus especially on the mechanisms of nsp1 and ORF6, which are the two most potent and best studied SARS-CoV-2 type I IFN inhibitors. We also discuss naturally occurring mutations in these SARS-CoV-2 IFN antagonists and the impact of these mutations in vitro and on clinical presentation. As SARS-CoV-2 continues to spread and evolve, researchers will have the opportunity to study natural mutations in IFN antagonists and assess their role in disease. Additional studies that look more closely at previously identified antagonists and newly arising mutants may inform future therapeutic interventions for COVID-19.

Complex analysis of the personalized pharmacotherapy in the management of COVID-19 patients and suggestions for applications of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine attitude.

AIMS: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is rapidly spreading worldwide. Drug therapy is one of the major treatments, but contradictory results of clinical trials have been reported among different individuals. Furthermore, comprehensive analysis of personalized pharmacotherapy is still lacking. In this study, analyses were performed on 47 well-characterized COVID-19 drugs used in the personalized treatment of COVID-19. METHODS: Clinical trials with published results of drugs use for COVID-19 treatment were collected to evaluate drug efficacy. Drug-to-Drug Interactions (DDIs) were summarized and classified. Functional variations in actionable pharmacogenes were collected and systematically analysed. "Gene Score" and "Drug Score" were defined and calculated to systematically analyse ethnicity-based genetic differences, which are important for the safer use of COVID-19 drugs. RESULTS: Our results indicated that four antiviral agents (ritonavir, darunavir, daclatasvir and sofosbuvir) and three immune regulators (budesonide, colchicine and prednisone) as well as heparin and enalapril could generate the highest number of DDIs with common concomitantly utilized drugs. Eight drugs (ritonavir, daclatasvir, sofosbuvir, ribavirin, interferon alpha-2b, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and ceftriaxone had actionable pharmacogenomics (PGx) biomarkers among all ethnic groups. Fourteen drugs (ritonavir, daclatasvir, prednisone, dexamethasone, ribavirin, HCQ, ceftriaxone, zinc, interferon beta-1a, remdesivir, levofloxacin, lopinavir, human immunoglobulin G and losartan) showed significantly different pharmacogenomic characteristics in relation to the ethnic origin of the patient. CONCLUSION: We recommend that particularly for patients with comorbidities to avoid serious DDIs, the predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM, 3 PM) strategies have to be applied for COVID-19 treatment, and genetic tests should be performed for drugs with actionable pharmacogenes, especially in some ethnic groups with a higher frequency of functional variations, as our analysis showed. We also suggest that drugs associated with higher ethnic genetic differences should be given priority in future pharmacogenetic studies for COVID-19 management. To facilitate translation of our results into clinical practice, an approach conform with PPPM/3 PM principles was suggested. In summary, the proposed PPPM/3 PM attitude should be obligatory considered for the overall COVID-19 management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-021-00247-0.

Efficacy of subcutaneous interferon-beta in COVID-19: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Type 1 interferons, especially interferon-beta, has been reported to be effective in COVID-19 patients in multiple randomized controlled trials. The aim of our meta-analysis and systematic review is to assess efficacy of subcutaneous IFN-beta in regards to mortality and discharge rate. Prospective, retrospective and randomized controlled trials were included. Primary outcomes measured were 28-day mortality and discharge rate. Secondary outcomes measured were mean hospital stay and post-intervention intubation rate. A thorough literature search was conducted in Medline, PubMed, Ovid journals, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials & Database of Systematic Reviews from 1 April 2020 to 28 February 2021. Relative risk was calculated using both the Mantel-Haenszel method (fixed-effects model) and DerSimonian Laird method (random effects model). The heterogeneity among studies was tested using Cochran's Q test, based upon inverse variance weights. 7 studies were included in the meta-analysis and systematic review. The IFN-beta group did not improve the 28-day mortality (RR = 1.276; 95% CI: 1.106-1.472, p = 0.001) or the discharge rate (RR = 0.906; 95% CI = 0.85-0.95, p = < 0.001). The mean hospital stay was 11.95± 2.5 days in the interferon-beta group and 11.43 ± 3.74 days in the traditional treatment group. Likewise, interferon-beta did not add any advantage to post-intervention intubation rate (RR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.7841-1.0816, p = 0.3154). Our findings revealed that use of subcutaneous interferon-beta is futile in COVID-19.

Effects of Interferon Beta in COVID-19 adult patients: Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The high rate of transmission and infection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a public health emergency of major epidemiological concern. No definitive treatments have been established, and vaccinations have only recently begun. We aim to review the efficacy and safety of Interferon Beta (IFN-ß) in patients who have a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search from PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were conducted from December 2019 to December 2020 to review the efficacy and safety of IFN-ß in adult patients with COVID-19 confirmed. We included randomized controlled trials, case reports, and experimental studies. Correspondences, letters, editorials, reviews, commentaries, case control, cross-sectional, and cohort studies that did not include any new clinical data were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 66 searched studies, 8 were included in our review. These studies demonstrated that although IFN-ß did not reduce the time to clinical response, there was an increase in discharge rate at day 14 and a decrease in mortality at day 28. The time to negative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was shown to be significantly shortened in patients receiving IFN-ß, along with a lower nasopharyngeal viral load. Further, patients receiving IFN-ß had a less significant rise in IL-6. IFN-ß was shown to decrease intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate, the requirement of invasive ventilation in severe cases, and improve the survival rate compared to control groups. There were no severe adverse events reported. Our review found that patients who received early treatment with IFN-ß experienced significantly reduced length of hospitalization, mortality, ICU admission, and mechanical ventilation. A greater chance of clinical improvement and improved imaging studies was noted in patients who received IFN-ß. There were no reported deaths associated with the addition of IFN-ß. Further randomized trials involving more significant sample sizes are needed to better understand the effect of IFN-ß on survival in COVID-19. CONCLUSION: This review identified encouraging data and outcomes of incorporating IFN-ß to treat COVID-19 patients. IFN-ß has been shown to decrease hospital stay's overall length and decrease the severity of respiratory symptoms when added to the standard of care. Also, in some studies, it has been demonstrated to reduce the length of ICU stay, enhance survival rate, and decrease the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. There were minor side effects reported (neuropsychiatric symptoms and hypersensitivity reaction). However, randomized clinical trials with a large sample size are needed to assess IFN-ß's benefit precisely.

The Impact of Interferon Beta-1b Therapy on Thyroid Function and Autoimmunity Among COVID-19 Survivors.

Background: Some studies have indicated that interferon (IFN) may be valuable in COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate the impact of short-term IFN on incident thyroid dysfunction and autoimmunity among COVID-19 survivors. Methods: We included consecutive adults without known thyroid disorder admitted to Queen Mary Hospital for COVID-19 from July 2020 to January 2021 who had thyroid function tests (TFTs) and anti-thyroid antibodies measured both on admission and at three months. Results: 226 patients were included (median age 55.0 years; 49.6% men): 135 were IFN-treated. There tended to be more abnormal TFTs upon reassessment in IFN-treated patients (8.1% vs 2.2%, p=0.080). 179 patients (65.4% IFN-treated) had a complete reassessment of anti-thyroid antibodies. There were significant increases in titres of both anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies (anti-TPO: baseline 29.21 units [IQR: 14.97 - 67.14] vs reassessment 34.30 units [IQR: 18.82 - 94.65], p<0.001) and anti-thyroglobulin antibodies (anti-Tg: baseline 8.23 units [IQR: 5.40 - 18.44] vs reassessment 9.14 units [IQR: 6.83 - 17.17], p=0.001) in the IFN-treated group but not IFN-naïve group. IFN treatment (standardised beta 0.245, p=0.001) was independently associated with changes in anti-TPO titre. Of the 143 patients negative for anti-TPO at baseline, 8 became anti-TPO positive upon reassessment (seven IFN-treated; one IFN-naïve). Incident anti-TPO positivity was more likely to be associated with abnormal TFTs upon reassessment (phi 0.188, p=0.025). Conclusion: IFN for COVID-19 was associated with modest increases in anti-thyroid antibody titres, and a trend of more incident anti-TPO positivity and abnormal TFTs during convalescence. Our findings suggest that clinicians monitor the thyroid function and anti-thyroid antibodies among IFN-treated COVID-19 survivors, and call for further follow-up studies regarding the clinical significance of these changes.